Re: Universal grammar


Hans Aberg wrote:

I try to point the difference between no change in the general framework
and discovering say new particles that require new additions that fits
well into the general framework.

Thanks for the long reply, and allow me to just answer one point,
or else our messages will soon get meters long and occupy us
for the rest of our lives ... I take it non-locality is an established
physical reality? tested, and of the same order as a particle?
a real physical phenomenon and not just a theoretical fancy?
Well then, yesterday I read an article on black holes in the
New Scientist. Non-locality is said to be not just a small-scale
ambiguity but acting on every scale, even in cosmic dimensions,
and it may give raise to a second relativity theory. I guess you
have access to the journal. If not, I can give you some quotes.
Anyway, I feel that non-locality is a big challenge we have not
yet really began to cope with. Non-locality involves information,
and so it will lead to the new physical theory I am babbling
about. Key names are Suesskind and Malcadam (hope the
spelling is right). And a new genius may just now experiment
with a Coke bottle at the kitchen table and be scolded by
the parents ...

Have a nice weekend

Franz Gnaedinger

.

Loading