Re: Universal grammar
- From: haberg@xxxxxxxxxx (Hans Aberg)
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:08:25 GMT
In article <8764dkzlf3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LEE Sau Dan
<danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hans> One should also be aware of that the early CPUs did not have
Hans> special treatment of IO (input/output) devices etc. Instead,
Hans> the computer manufacturer put some IO devices on specific
Hans> memory addresses, which the CPU could read and write
Hans> from. The chip hardware has since become more complicated.
You're talking about memory-mapped I/O. That's a separate dimension
from interrupts and DMA (direct-memory-access).
Sure. Info to those interested in the workings of a CPU - especially those
that somehow got the idea it is difficult. :-)
--
Hans Aberg
.
- References:
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Universal grammar
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Universal grammar
- Prev by Date: Re: why Deceiver ("Saitan")?
- Next by Date: Re: why Deceiver ("Saitan")?
- Previous by thread: Re: Universal grammar
- Next by thread: Re: Universal grammar
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|