Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: "Greg Lee" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Nov 2006 17:03:15 -0800
Paul J Kriha wrote:
....
IANAL as well, but, could he have meant an "adverb"?
He meant the thing doesn't end in -ly and is in some sort of
construction with the verb. It seems pretty obvious. If you
really want to waste time by arguing terms, why don't you
just say what you'd like to call it? IAL.
Greg
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- References:
- ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- From: Paul J Kriha
- ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- Prev by Date: Re: New pronunciation of Bangalore
- Next by Date: Re: Did ubaidians speak a semitic language ?
- Previous by thread: Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- Next by thread: Re: ``This country has spoken loudly and clearly''
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|