Re: Two pairs of technical terms
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Nov 2006 20:55:52 -0800
Joe Fineman wrote:
"Stefano MAC:GREGOR" <esperantujo@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Nouns decline to form different forms for case and number.
In Hebrew, nouns do not inflect on the Latin pattern -- a house, of a
house, to a house, etc.; they have forms that mean a house, the house
of..., my house, thy house, his house, etc. I certainly wouldn't call
those cases, but I think one refers to the pattern as a declension.
I did once hear someone who had studied Latin & started on Hebrew say
in wonderment: A Hebrew noun has a form that indicates that the
following noun is in the genitive case. %^)
That's less silly than it appears, because in the Semitic languages
that haven't lost their case endings (Akkadian and Arabic), the second
noun in a construct _is_ in the genitive.
But attaching the possessive pronouns isn't declension -- it's
suffixing.
In Aramaic, nouns have _three_ "states" in their declension: absolute,
construct, and emphatic. ("Emphatic" isn't a good name, because it
refers to the form with the suffixed definite article, which eventually
became the unmarked form of the noun,)
.
- References:
- Two pairs of technical terms
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Two pairs of technical terms
- From: Stefano MAC:GREGOR
- Re: Two pairs of technical terms
- From: Joe Fineman
- Two pairs of technical terms
- Prev by Date: Re: Two pairs of technical terms
- Next by Date: Re: Book recommendation?
- Previous by thread: Re: Two pairs of technical terms
- Next by thread: Re: Two pairs of technical terms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|