Re: Language and SPM
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Nov 2006 10:28:09 -0800
Ruud Harmsen wrote:
25 Nov 2006 06:17:46 -0800: "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
Since when is a radio broadcast considered an example of natural
speech???
This is the sort of nonsense I do not have to put up with. Ploink.
Answer the question.
What's Ploink?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Language and SPM
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Language and SPM
- References:
- Language and SPM
- From: FoggyTown
- Re: Language and SPM
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Language and SPM
- From: Pierre Jelenc
- Re: Language and SPM
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Language and SPM
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Language and SPM
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Language and SPM
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Language and SPM
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Language and SPM
- Prev by Date: Re: Issues with Chinese
- Next by Date: Re: lend/borrow
- Previous by thread: Re: Language and SPM
- Next by thread: Re: Language and SPM
- Index(es):