Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: "ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx" <ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Dec 2006 08:00:15 -0800
Ruud Harmsen wrote:
2 Dec 2006 04:12:24 -0800: "ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx"
<ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
I don't know about Finnish, but the <w> approximants of Dutch and
Hawaiian are not the same approximant; only the former is labiodental.
... in some variants of the language, and even then only in non-final
position (in medial position it varies).
http://rudhar.com/fonetics/fvw.htm
I can't tell your f and v apart.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- References:
- labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: Sonja Elen Kisa
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Prev by Date: Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- Next by Date: Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Previous by thread: Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Next by thread: Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|