Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailonsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:53:58 +0100
2 Dec 2006 08:00:15 -0800: "ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx"
<ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
... in some variants of the language, and even then only in non-final
position (in medial position it varies).
http://rudhar.com/fonetics/fvw.htm
I can't tell your f and v apart.
The difference is voice. But admittedly, in some contexts, especially
initial, the difference is slight. Moreover, fricatives are hard to
record reliably.
--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: António Marques
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- References:
- labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: Sonja Elen Kisa
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Prev by Date: Re: What's the difference between man and human?
- Next by Date: Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- Previous by thread: Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Next by thread: Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|