Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailonsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 14:20:36 +0100
2 Dec 2006 04:12:24 -0800: "ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx"
<ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
I don't know about Finnish, but the <w> approximants of Dutch and
Hawaiian are not the same approximant; only the former is labiodental.
.... in some variants of the language, and even then only in non-final
position (in medial position it varies).
http://rudhar.com/fonetics/fvw.htm
--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- References:
- labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: Sonja Elen Kisa
- Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Prev by Date: Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- Next by Date: Re: ``If you don't want it, there are other nations who will''
- Previous by thread: Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Next by thread: Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|