Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Joachim Pense <snob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:19:53 +0100
Am Sat, 02 Dec 2006 11:57:23 -0500 schrieb Nathan Sanders:
Note my use of "first", not "native". The ability to learn a native
language continues for a few more years (it is certainly gone by about
age 10). The ability to start your *first* language does not last
past about age 5.
Does the last sentence hold because there is some specific ability
needed for acquiring a first language that gets lost by the age of
five, or is it just that by that age you will already have acquired a
language (if you are able to acquire language at all), so whatever
language you acquire now will be at least the second?
Joachim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- References:
- Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Do children learn language more easily?
- Prev by Date: Re: labiodental approximant transliterated as V or W?
- Next by Date: Re: More Etymology!
- Previous by thread: Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- Next by thread: Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|