Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Dec 2006 04:35:40 -0800
Jim Heckman (reply-to) wrote:
On 2-Dec-2006, Nathan Sanders <nsanders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message <nsanders-C7EE12.11572302122006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
[...]
Note my use of "first", not "native". The ability to learn a native
language continues for a few more years (it is certainly gone by about
age 10). The ability to start your *first* language does not last
past about age 5.
Is it possible that the loss of the ability to learn a native
language is tied to puberty, when so many other changes are
occurring in the body? I've known people who learned native-level
American English having come to the US as late as age 14, but none
who arrived in their late teens that didn't have at least a couple
of non-native tics.
Has there been any research on this specific question?
That's precisely Eric Lenneberg's "critical period hypothesis," and
it's the focus of L1 acquisition research.
.
- References:
- Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- From: Jim Heckman
- Do children learn language more easily?
- Prev by Date: Re: etymology of the word zero
- Next by Date: Re: An Example of A Complex Chinese Character
- Previous by thread: Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- Next by thread: Re: Do children learn language more easily?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|