Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: "John Atkinson" <johnacko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:50:32 GMT
"Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
Ekkehard Dengler wrote:"Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
>
> Ekkehard Dengler wrote:
> > The exact meaning of "the 'Mary' vowel" obviously depends on > > which
variety
> > of English you're talking about.
>
> No, in the context of these newsgroups (not that I crossposted to > aue),
> Mary is a label for a certain quality of vowel, for which there may > or
> may not be a "cardinal number" or an "IPA transcription" (for which > I
> have asked many, many times, and no one has ever provided one).
The following excerpt from the AUE FAQ does provide an IPA transcription of
sorts. It also implies that "Mary" couldn't sensibly be used to describe a
particular vowel quality, the reason being that the pronunciation of the
name varies considerably between accents:
"Where there are two columns, the left column shows British Received
Pronunciation (RP), and the right column shows a rhotic pronunciation used
by at least some U.S. speakers.
(...)
[E] = [<epsilon>] as in:
'end' /End/ /End/
'get' /gEt/ /gEt/
'Mary' /'mE@rI/ /mE@ri/
'merry' /'mErI/ /'mEri/
Some U.S. speakers do not distinguish between 'Mary',
'merry', and 'marry'."
If "Mary" stood for a particular vowel quality rather than for (a vowel
phoneme in) a set of words, the last sentence would be nonsensical.
Perhaps that table was designed by Bob Cunningham or Ruud Haarmsen, as
it indicates phonemes but perhaps intends a phonetic transcription.
They certainly look like they're meant to be phonemes to me! How would you phonemise these words, using the symbols common among most British linguists (where /E@/ denotes a single phoneme, the SQUARE vowel)?
Phonetically, Mary is most certainly not merry with a centralizing
glide.
Phonetically, it certainly is, in my dialect. Likewise in RP, and, as far as I know, other non-rhotic southern Brit. I assume you're not referring to these, though, but to your own variety, which, you seem to be implying, is "standard" in the sense that anyone who doesn't know what you mean can't speak English.
In an attempt to work out what you're getting at, I just consulted Wells "Accents of English". Yes, I know from experience that he doesn't always get things right, but it's the best I've got.
Quote: ""In the New York City area SQUARE words usually have /E@/, a distinct phoneme. But GenAm has no such phoneme. For the GenAm minority who distinguish <Mary> from both <merry> and <marry>, <Mary> must be must be regarded phonologically as as /meIri/, with the FACE vowel, whatever its realization (usually [e] or [e@] )."
Is this right? If not, is it wrong/incomplete/just plain sloppy?
John.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: António Marques
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- References:
- some more Irish vowels
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Ekkehard Dengler
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Ekkehard Dengler
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Ekkehard Dengler
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Ekkehard Dengler
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Ekkehard Dengler
- Re: some more Irish vowels
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- some more Irish vowels
- Prev by Date: Re: accidental gaps
- Next by Date: Re: Universal grammar
- Previous by thread: Re: some more Irish vowels
- Next by thread: Re: some more Irish vowels
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading