Re: No diacritics in English
- From: naddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Christian Weisgerber)
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:22:39 +0000 (UTC)
*** T. Winter <***.Winter@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > J, U and W were not used in Latin (and Y and Z were only for Greek
> > loanwords). In Italian, J is considered a variant of I,
>
> And something like that was true even in German writing. :-)
You could still find the same *much* later. As late as 1976 when I
drove by car through Germany we have gone through the city Jtzehoe.
For typefaces where the I and l glyphs look almost or exactly alike,
I is occasionally replaced with J to avoid confusion. The most
common example is "Jllustrierte" instead of "Illustrierte". Now
that I think about it, I don't remember seeing this in years. Maybe
it has gone out of fashion.
Also in Germany the assignment of letters to digits on telephones
was: 1 = A, 2 = B, 3 = C, 4 = D, 5 = E, 6 = F, 7 = G, 8 = H,
9 = I + J, 0 = K.
In what context did this assignment ever appear?
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No diacritics in English
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: No diacritics in English
- References:
- Re: No diacritics in English
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: No diacritics in English
- From: Jens S. Larsen
- Re: No diacritics in English
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: No diacritics in English
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: No diacritics in English
- Prev by Date: Re: Why "kompressor" in German?
- Next by Date: Re: Pseudo-cognates?
- Previous by thread: Re: No diacritics in English
- Next by thread: Re: No diacritics in English
- Index(es):