Re: Difference between semivowel and consonant
- From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailonsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:40:40 +0100
14 Dec 2006 14:29:29 -0800: "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
Ruud Harmsen wrote:
Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:34:53 -0500: Nathan Sanders
<nsanders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
Some linguists, especially Americans, use [y] to mean IPA [j], with
[j] having no consistent meaning.
Don't tell PTD about that. He wouldn't believe you. How could anything
have been achieved if that were true?
Apparently you aren't aware that Americanist <j> for [dZ] bears a
hachek. <j> alone is not used in phonological transcriptions --
precisely because Germans would misinterpret it.
J without a hacek is often used in transcriptions of Arabic. And in
that context, I think it is convenient and clear.
--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Difference between semivowel and consonant
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Difference between semivowel and consonant
- References:
- Difference between semivowel and consonant
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Difference between semivowel and consonant
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Difference between semivowel and consonant
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Difference between semivowel and consonant
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Difference between semivowel and consonant
- Prev by Date: Re: some more Irish vowels
- Next by Date: Re: Pseudo-cognates?
- Previous by thread: Re: Difference between semivowel and consonant
- Next by thread: Re: Difference between semivowel and consonant
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|