Re: curious Minnesota vowels
- From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:30:31 -0500
John Atkinson wrote:
"Harlan Messinger" <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote..
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
Why wouldn't "Mary" and "wear(ing)" exhibit the _same_ vowel, whatever
the speaker's dialect?
Well, first of all it just now occurs to me this is the opposite of the usual phenomenon--usually we're talking about "marry" being pronounced like "Mary". Here, you say "Mary" is being pronounced "marry". In that case--any chance that it's *only* "Mary" that's pronounced this way? It seems to me that in some or all dialects in England "Mary" is pronounced with /a/, but "hairy" and "scary" aren't.
I've never heard any English speaker from England who doesn't pronounce "Mary", "scary", and "hairy" as exact rhymes. I'm know people exist who don't rhyme "Mary" and "hairy"-- the same ones that don't rhyme "scary" and "hairy" -- but they're rare.
It turns out I was thinking of "Marie", not "Mary". I was thinking of the pronunciation in "Calendar Girls". I don't know about in southern England, but in the US we stress the second syllable.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: curious Minnesota vowels
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: curious Minnesota vowels
- References:
- curious Minnesota vowels
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: curious Minnesota vowels
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: curious Minnesota vowels
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: curious Minnesota vowels
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: curious Minnesota vowels
- From: John Atkinson
- curious Minnesota vowels
- Prev by Date: Re: curious Minnesota vowels
- Next by Date: Re: Cardinal vowels
- Previous by thread: Re: curious Minnesota vowels
- Next by thread: Re: curious Minnesota vowels
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|