Re: Racism
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Jan 2007 08:25:25 -0800
John Atkinson wrote:
"Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
[...]
Brian M. Scott wrote:
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not any more. As soon as a word has been widely taken into
curse use, it becomes virtually impossible to use it in
any other way, except perhaps in limited circles, such
as scholars who can really agree on using such a word as
a term.
While it has certainly started down that road, I don't agree
that 'racist' has reached that point. 'Fascist', yes;
'racist', no.
"Fascist" has been rescued from the brink of meaningless opprobrium
(which seems to be what Jukka means by "curse") by the Bush
administration, which has largely embraced fascism in the classic
Mussolini sense of interpenetration of business and government.
Surely it's the Bush administration and/or its supporters who have given
the word another shove in the direction of that brink, by christening
its opponents "islamo-fascists"?
Indeed. There's that too. But that is strictly in Jukka's sense.
.
- References:
- Re: Racism
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Racism
- Prev by Date: Re: Donkey and monkey
- Next by Date: Re: Why Beijing?
- Previous by thread: Re: Racism
- Next by thread: Re: Racism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|