Re: Racism

Scripsit Peter T. Daniels:

From all of what follows, it appears that you simply don't know what
the word "fascist" means within the discipline of poltiical economy.

You seem to achieve new forms of misquoting. The first line above is _not_ quoted from my text, despite your use of the quote mark.

The word "fascist" was a _political_ term that referred to a certain movement in Italy from the 1920s to the 1940s. It became a curse word and has remained so for over half a century. I have no idea what your "poltiical economy" is, and if someone wanted to coin a word like "fascist" (or "racist" or "idiot" or "fucking") as a _term_ in political economics, he would be quite lost in practical issues of language.

You seem to continue pointless massive quoting, despite continued remarks about it. It's a usual sign of cluelessness and disruptive behavior as well as lack of comprehensive reading on Usenet.

that basically dates back to uncle Joe.

Your Uncle Jow died when I was 2 years old. I never "observed" him.

I never said you observed him or even that you knew of him. What I was referring to was the fact that you continue the Soviet communists' propagandistic use of the word "fascist". Stalin probably used it consciously and on purpose, knowing what he was doing; you just propagate a tradition apparently without realizing its origin and effect.

Obviously I am not the first, nor am I the only, English-speaker to
point out that the Bush administration operates under the classic
principles of fascism -- the very "military-industrial complex" that
Dwight David Eisehower (have you heard of him?) warned against in his
Farewell Address in 1960.

I'm quite astonished at your chronology and I won't even ask which Bush was criticized by Eisenhower (I guess this, and not yours, is the right spelling).

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

.

Loading