Re: Racism


Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
Scripsit Peter T. Daniels:

From all of what follows, it appears that you simply don't know what
the word "fascist" means within the discipline of poltiical economy.

You seem to achieve new forms of misquoting. The first line above is _not_
quoted from my text, despite your use of the quote mark.

I am not responsible for the way newsreaders assign chevrons, or for
your sloppy selection of text to delete. If you don't know that I wrote
those two lines, then you have a very serious problem.

The word "fascist" was a _political_ term that referred to a certain
movement in Italy from the 1920s to the 1940s. It became a curse word and
has remained so for over half a century. I have no idea what your "poltiical
economy" is, and if someone wanted to coin a word like "fascist" (or
"racist" or "idiot" or "fucking") as a _term_ in political economics, he
would be quite lost in practical issues of language.

You seem to continue pointless massive quoting, despite continued remarks
about it. It's a usual sign of cluelessness and disruptive behavior as well
as lack of comprehensive reading on Usenet.

How many times have we had to point out that you have misunderstood
something because you failed to consult the context?

that basically dates back to uncle Joe.

Your Uncle Joe died when I was 2 years old. I never "observed" him.

I never said you observed him or even that you knew of him. What I was
referring to was the fact that you continue the Soviet communists'
propagandistic use of the word "fascist". Stalin probably used it
consciously and on purpose, knowing what he was doing; you just propagate a
tradition apparently without realizing its origin and effect.

Etymology is irrelevant to the meaning of a word. The word "fascism"
refers to the interpenetration of business and government.

Obviously I am not the first, nor am I the only, English-speaker to
point out that the Bush administration operates under the classic
principles of fascism -- the very "military-industrial complex" that
Dwight David Eisehower (have you heard of him?) warned against in his
Farewell Address in 1960.

I'm quite astonished at your chronology and I won't even ask which Bush was
criticized by Eisenhower (I guess this, and not yours, is the right
spelling).

You are beyond interacting with. You are either immeasurably stupid or
wilfully misinterpreting everything you see.

.

Loading