Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: phoglund@xxxxxx
- Date: 2 Jan 2007 02:30:25 -0800
Heidi Graw kirjoitti:
Explain to me how one gets from Toricum to Ziurichi.
Elementary: zweite Lautverschiebung plus i-Umlaut. I am no historical
linguist, but this belongs really to the elementary course of German
historical linguistics - the one everybody takes.
The -um in the end is only required by Latin, the relevant part is
Toric-.
The change from T to Z [ts] is regular in southern German (Zeit cf.
English tide, Swedish tid; Zoll < medieval Latin toloneum).
The change from ou to iu before historical long i is regular too.
We end up with a pre-Zweite Lautverschiebung, pre-i-Umlaut form
*tourik-, which is similar enough to Toricum. (Latin cannot represent
diphthongs, of course).
This is what is possible to say only on the basis of first-year German
- being more interested in literature, I never actually learnt more
historical linguistics than the basics. I know it is flawed, but it is
certainly nearer to the received scholarly truth than your ideas.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- References:
- The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Heidi Graw
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Heidi Graw
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Heidi Graw
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Heidi Graw
- The Origins of Zürich...
- Prev by Date: Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- Next by Date: Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- Previous by thread: Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- Next by thread: Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|