Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Jan 2007 21:35:44 -0800
Heidi Graw wrote:
"Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1167782931.136486.161020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Peter wrote:
Yet you never seem to learn anything, and you never seem to recognize
that you're wrong.
Peter, I'm fully aware that linguistics is at best an inexact science. I
don't discount anything. I collect anything and everything, even if it's
contrairy. I bear *all* of this in mind. Some of what I collect appears
more reasonable than some other stuff. I give more weight to that what
makes most sense and what is best supported. And while I might have picked
and chosen something to be foremost and strongest, I still don't toss out
the other stuff.
You hang on to the nonsense.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Heidi Graw
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- References:
- The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Heidi Graw
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Heidi Graw
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Heidi Graw
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Keith GOERINGER
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Heidi Graw
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- From: Heidi Graw
- The Origins of Zürich...
- Prev by Date: Re: How are syllable boundaries determined
- Next by Date: Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- Previous by thread: Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- Next by thread: Re: The Origins of Zürich...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|