Re: are we mature for a mnemonic human communication code
- From: "Heidi Graw" <hgraw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:21:57 GMT
"gunananda" <gunananda@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message(snip)
news:1167951460.776685.199070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
gunananda wrote:
The latin alphabet is the most used limited set of symbols used for
communication throughout the world and I see no reason for abandoning
that.
Why not simply use Pitman Shorthand symbols? Then there's no need to
quibble about the spellings of words. Spelling Bees can then be a thing of
the past. One can write as quickly as one speaks. It saves on writing
space.
http://pitmanshorthand.homestead.com/
When I learned Pitman Shorthand, I thought to myself, "Why are we still
using the Latin alphabet?" We should get rid of it! There is a far faster
and efficient way to write stuff down.
Heidi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: are we mature for a mnemonic human communication code
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: are we mature for a mnemonic human communication code
- References:
- are we mature for a mnemonic human communication code
- From: gunananda
- are we mature for a mnemonic human communication code
- Prev by Date: Re: Chinese people and the absolute ear
- Next by Date: Re: You read it hear first! [was: Re: marry merry mary]
- Previous by thread: are we mature for a mnemonic human communication code
- Next by thread: Re: are we mature for a mnemonic human communication code
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
