Re: yiddish
- From: "mb" <azythos2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jan 2007 15:35:22 -0800
On Jan 28, 1:12 pm, phogl...@xxxxxx wrote:
mb wrote:....
Maybe not, but a distinct literary norm, using a different alphabet, is
quite a criterion indeed.
Criterion of what? We have a very clearly high German language, with a
level of structural borrowing that would only be characterized as
"mild" on the usual scales. Politically or religiously motivated
differences in alphabet are a worldwide phenomenon and they do not
supersede the genetic relaptionships except for politically motivated
nationalist nonsense.
Read it anew. I said "a distinct literary norm, using a different
alphabet". The point is a sociolinguistic one. Both the distinct
literary norm and the different alphabet are part of it. A distinct
literary norm does not just entail "politically motivated nationalist
nonsense", but it might also entail a different set of dialects as
basis for the standard language. This is very much the case with
Yiddish, which is essentially a West Middle German dialect, while the
German standard language has a much broader dialectal basis.
You're absolutely right there, when it comes to writing / expression
in high standard. Which is another dialect.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: yiddish
- From: phoglund
- Re: yiddish
- References:
- yiddish
- From: ivan danicic
- Re: yiddish
- From: phoglund
- Re: yiddish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: yiddish
- From: phoglund
- Re: yiddish
- From: mb
- Re: yiddish
- From: phoglund
- yiddish
- Prev by Date: Re: yiddish
- Next by Date: Re: Sign language questions
- Previous by thread: Re: yiddish
- Next by thread: Re: yiddish
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|