Re: unnatural languages
- From: "gunananda" <gunananda@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Feb 2007 13:28:28 -0800
however the difference between a conlang and a natural language is
hard to tell.
Present Hebrew for instance could be considered just a conlang based
on Old Hebrew
and so almost whole Israel would speak a conlang.
Also what do you get if you mix up two close dialects or subdialects
and make your
own language out of it. Is this a conlang or a natural language?
for instance if you mix up British with American English and a native
styrian
accent - i mean, could this be a conlang ?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: António Marques
- Re: unnatural languages
- References:
- unnatural languages
- From: gunananda
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Padraic Brown
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Christopher Culver
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: phoglund
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Christopher Culver
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: mb
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: phoglund
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Christopher Culver
- unnatural languages
- Prev by Date: Re: Tánaistithe in IPA
- Next by Date: Re: unnatural languages
- Previous by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Next by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Index(es):
Loading