Re: More Etymology!

On Feb 4, 2:19 am, "heliogabalus" <forbid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

My eyes's problem isn't a pretext.

Sorry, I didn't know about this. Take care.

Nonsense from the Web? I gave you the opinion of Prof. Yosef Garfinkel
(Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem),
published by the University of Texas at Austin. Garfinkel unequivocally
speaks of 'architectural decorations' about Göbekli Tepe glyphs.

Thanks, but only if you accept, to reciprocate, a copy of The Book Of
Good Manners, by William C. Green, a complete and authentic authority on
every single phase of social usage.

I reported you the opinion of an archeologist (two words). Is it so
difficult to you to explain in few words what your archeologist said
about the Göbekli Tepe glyphs?

I took my time informing you about the intriguing discoveries
made in _this_ decade, and then you go and wipe out what
I said by quoting from papers written and published in the
_past_ millennium. I know this way of arguing only too well.
It's one of the favorite tricks of academe. Annihilate new
ideas and discoveries by quoting old papers ... Doesn't
inspire kind feelings and polite behaving in me. I spent
quite some time and a considerable amount of money
for getting original publications on Göbekli Tepe and
related Early Neolithic sites in Anatolia, some of them
hard to retrieve and expensive, I share the information
here, and what is my reward? my words are wiped out
on the basis of ignorance and old papers.

I think you are underrating the resources of this newsgroup.

I see how leading regulars of sci.lang avoid new books
and discoveries - books written and discoveries made
by people from academe!

Now somebody killrate my message.

.