Re: More Etymology!


"Franz Gnaedinger" <frgn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1170747946.545432.46280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 5, 11:19 pm, "heliogabalus" <forbid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I know not much of academe, being a simple dilettante. Furthermore, I
point out that you more and more are crediting me with false
attributions. Sometimes I wonder if you read my messages for more
than three seconds. Where have I cited an obsolete paper?

The dates you gave were 1988, 1991, 1998, while the relevant
discoveries, for example the many hieroglyphs on the pillars of
temple D, were made since 2000.

Please, Franz, don't make me neurasthenic. Where and when did I give you
those dates?

When I asked you a Klaus Schmidt's quote about the nature of
'hieroglyphs' you never answered me.

He discusses the "Stone Age Hieroglyphs" on six pages of his
book (221-226), you can't expect me to give you the full
translation of this chapter.

I only ask you two or three lines.

Now somebody killrate my message

Somebody loves you, I wonder who
I wonder who he can be
Somebody wants you, I wish I knew
Who the one could be worries you




.

Quantcast