Re: Motivation behind Magdalenian

On Feb 13, 11:31 am, "Franz Gnaedinger" <f...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 13, 3:03 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



So now you're claiming that the "Phoenician tablet" is from someplace
called "Glozel"?

Did this somehow have something to do with the posting to which you
attached it?

What is your problem? I am saying that the Glozel
inscriptions have nothing to do with Magdalenian.
The earliest possible time for some of them is
the third century BC.

And do they have something to do with the so-called "Phoenician
Tablet"?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Motivation behind Magdalenian
    ... The latter inscriptions are obviously fakes. ... If it were Magdalenian, ... in caves, Lascaux, Altamira, and so on. ... no theory can be built on dubious artefacts, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Motivation behind Magdalenian
    ... What evidence is there that the marks drawn correspond to marks ... The latter inscriptions are obviously fakes. ... If it were Magdalenian, ... no theory can be built on dubious artefacts, ...
    (sci.lang)