Re: Heidi's Poll Results:


Heidi Graw wrote:
"Harlan Messinger" <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:53m200F1t0k11U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(snip)

Harlan wrote:
There is no relationship between this assessment and the responses you
received to your poll. I just ran through the first few levels of response
and found not one person who said you shouldn't participate.

I've been told on three occasions to leave this forum, three different
people made this request.

Which was it, you were TOLD or you were REQUESTED?

Oh, I read what's written in the way of responses to my posts and my
queries. I also think about what is written. None of this stuff is lost on
me. What some people may be irritated at is that I do not always
jump on the bandwagon right away claiming, "Yes, you are right!"

You have never said: "I agree with that, for reason X. I disagree with
that, for reason Y."

There are far too many different ideas by assorted sci.lang members
for meto side with anyone in particular. What I do is simply collect
all the different view-points and assess them based on how
well they are supported. What I eventually end up doing
with all the material that I gather, I keep to myself. If folks
here want my validation for their ideas and their theories,
they're asking the wrong person!

It has nothing to do with "siding with." (Well, it does have to do
with having the wit to recognize that Franz and Dusan are handing you
fantasies rather than facts about "Germanic Lore.") IF you are doing
any "assessing," you show absolutely no evidence of doing so, since
every subsequent question is as ill-informed as every previous
question.

Believe me, no one is looking to you for "validation." It's abundantly
obvious that you don't have the slightest credentials for "validating"
_any_ sort of statement regarding "Germanic Lore."

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Heidis Poll Results:
    ... There is no relationship between this assessment and the responses you ... every subsequent question is as ill-informed as every previous ... no one is looking to you for "validation." ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: XFORMS
    ... The browser environment is not the same as an ... >>generate JavaScript to validate fields before submission to the server. ... > I get angry about his because we had better data validation on the ... we should provide responses at ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Newsgroup FAQs, Freguently asked questions
    ... I was mad because he had a much better view, much nicer house, etc, and his assessment should have been more like 20% or more higher. ... flat. ... And, I'll offer that I've been the only one who has _always_ posted a response, suggestion, or commentary on _all_ of his posts. ... Funny if none of my responses got to your server. ...
    (sci.research.careers)
  • Re: Firing server object/web service from a client validation...
    ... follow all the responses elsewhere and may be wasting our time replying when ... If you intend to maintain this validation on the client-side, ... > I have a server object that performs zipcode validation based on zipcode ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Firing server object/web service from a client validation...
    ... follow all the responses elsewhere and may be wasting our time replying when ... If you intend to maintain this validation on the client-side, ... > I have a server object that performs zipcode validation based on zipcode ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)