Re: SUR, HOR,DEL,GON,UM...

On Feb 18, 6:20 pm, "Heidi Graw" <h...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Dušan Vukotić" <dusan.vuko...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1171795756.276947.155210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 18, 10:33 am, "Heidi Graw" <h...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Btw, how would things change if you went with SUR, HOR, DEL, GON, UM?
Dusan wrote:
Very nice! :-)
I would have done whatever you wished, my dear Princess of
Heavenstein, only if it were in my power. In this specific case, I am
unable to fulfil your wish simply because the alveo-dental D in DEL
belongs to the secondary layer of consonants, obtained via velar to
dental changes.

Ah...o.k...I understand, your Excellency: Sur, Hor, Bel, Gon, Um...I'm
sounding those out
and checking how my lips form as I'm saying these words...very primate-like.
;-).

The Del would in that case be that secondary layer. Using the tongue would
require an evolutionary
advancement.

But, now I have to question the "Gon" sound...it's a back of the throat
kinda thing.

Sur, Hor, Bel, Um require solely lip movement...primary stage.
Moving inward, the dental allows for making that Del sound...secondary
stage.
And moving further in to create that back of the throat sounds (Gon), might
that be considered the *third* stage?

I'm trying to establish a logic and a sensible move from the outer to the
inner.

Try saying out the following and notice how one must use one lips, tongue,
and back of the throat...moving from the outer to the inner.

Stage one: Pursed lip words: oo, Sur, Hor.
Stage two: Compressed lip words: mm, Bel, Um, bum, bam, bush.
Stage three: Dentals: Del, Da, Do, toe, though, la-la, low, loo..
Stage four: Back of the throat: Gon, goo, ga-ga, growl, crawl.

I come up with:
UR-UM-DA-GON

I would also like to know if you created a wep-page that explains your
theory. I would very much like to read the details. If you haven't done
so, perhaps you can explain it to me here. I've been trying to figure out
just how exactly you came up with this theory, or if you had read it
somewhere else and modified it in some way.

Thank you, my friend! ;-)

Take care,
Heidi

Ten years ago I wrote a book entitled 'The Forefather of the European
Man". Of course, this book was not based on the scientific grounds and
I stressed it in the book's preface, by telling: "this is a free
flight of the White Eagle".

The facts is, many of the things I concluded there were wrong, but a
few "innovations" were very inspiring and fruitful. The most important
one was the idea that the human speech started from the sun divinity
and was developed later in accordance with the main characteristics of
the sun (irradiation, warmth, fire, round form etc.).

In the same book, I reasoned that one of the main self-generating
wells of speech was the sun-god Sur (Skt. Surya, Russian Zarya; Sargon
- the king of Akkad, Sirius, Osiris).

Later on, I added the other sun god, Hor (Egyptian Horus, Slavic Hors)
and it took me long before I understood that Sur and Hor were the same
gods, just differently pronounced (Xur).

In reality, the famous linguistic division to satem and centum
languages was the result of Sur-Hor (or Hor-Sur) rivalry. In the
course of my farther studies I found out a certain correspondence and
regular correlativity among Sur, Hor and the Babylonian god Bel
(Semitic Baal) and I included that god in my first Surbel-Horbel
"human speech formula".

It took me another few years to understand that my formula was
deficient because it missed the magic word that enables an omnipotent
animation and comprehensive movement of spiritual and material
objects. Therefore, I added the syllable GON as a "dues ex machina",
the main but invisible divine actor who solves the problem of the
continuing motion and evolution of language.
It is the way in which I "discovered" XUR-BEL-GON formula, improved,
decorated and self-propelled by human or divine power of mind (UM).

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: s->h
    ... BEL, GON, UM) ... URD - Urd's Well, where the gods meet in council each day. ... Btw, how would things change if you went with SUR, HOR, DEL, GON, UM? ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: taras
    ... I am talking about the most ancient syllables, ... Sur and Hor was the basis for the later satem-centum division. ... believe that the earliest language consisted of just four ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: taras
    ... I am talking about the most ancient syllables, ... Sur and Hor was the basis for the later satem-centum division. ... believe that the earliest language consisted of just four ...
    (sci.lang)