Re: Computer programming for linguists
- From: LEE Sau Dan <danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:14:54 +0800
"David" == David Delony <ickyelf@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Computer "languages" aren't like human languages, so they don't
>> have the characteristics that linguistic analysis is designed
>> to analyze.
David> I'm more interested in how linguists think about computer
David> programming.
And why not how linguists think about chip design? Because
programming involves "languages"? I assure you that chip design has
its own "languages", too. Boolean logic, on top of which layers of
abstractions are built, each could be considered a "language",
formally describable with grammars expressible in BNF.
--
Lee Sau Dan 李守敦 ~{@nJX6X~}
E-mail: danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home page: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~danlee
.
- References:
- Computer programming for linguists
- From: David Delony
- Re: Computer programming for linguists
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Computer programming for linguists
- From: David Delony
- Computer programming for linguists
- Prev by Date: Re: Computer programming for linguists
- Next by Date: Re: Computer programming for linguists
- Previous by thread: Re: Computer programming for linguists
- Next by thread: Re: Computer programming for linguists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|