Re: unnatural languages
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Mar 2007 04:40:46 -0800
On Mar 1, 7:34 am, "Andrew Woode" <andrew_wo...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1 Mar, 00:32, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 28, 12:47 pm, phogl...@xxxxxx wrote:
First, you suggested two people
were enough for a community.
Two people certainly isn't enough for an infant to acquire a language!
Go learn some psycholinguistics.
So what about people who grow up in one speech community, but acquire
another language from immigrant parents (sometimes just one parent, in
a linguistically mixed marriage?), with minimal reinforcement from
other speakers?. Is their speech automatically deficient?
I don't recall ever coming across a description of such a situation in
the literature.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: phoglund
- Re: unnatural languages
- References:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Andrew Woode
- Re: unnatural languages
- Prev by Date: Re: The word "rasismi" in Finnish (was Re: unnatural languages)
- Next by Date: Re: Ventris' grid
- Previous by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Next by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading