Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: "Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:05:02 +0800
"欲無言" <yuwuyan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:es5bud$phd$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
Is there any intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo
(for Chinese)?
None, other than being more easily read and typed by most Westerners.
The following sentence says there is, though it
doesn't specify what the advantage is.
英語是拼音系統,就拼音來說遠遠優於象形文字系統模仿拼
音系統的假拼音
It's nothing more than an unsupported statement of opinion.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Helmut Richter
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Outcomes of voiced labiovelar stop in Albanian
- Next by Date: Re: Venom-spitting from a safe distance - Cybalist cave!
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Index(es):
Loading