Re: This is a pol. Please, go to it !

OOPS ! I forgot to repete Heidi's link !
It's of course :
<http://heidigraw.0catch.com/sign.html>
You need to look only to the groups 5 and 2 (from the top), then to
groups 2 and 1 & 3 for the comparison, in order to cast your vote.

grapheus


On Mar 4, 2:51 pm, "graph...@xxxxxxx" <graph...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 4, 1:34 pm, "Marco Pagliero" <mart...@xxxxxx> wrote:

On 2 Mrz., 17:27, "graph...@xxxxxxx" <graph...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

It's to difficult to get a straight answer to a simple question from
all of you, guys !!! Neither Marco, nor Germaine, Peter and Ron have
given their vote.

Well, if I'm that Marco, I did give my vote, that is choice #1.

Yes, you gave it, but without fulfilling the preliminary (not so
easy !) condition : to recognize what I call the "upside down V",
which is easy to see on the original because this rest of the
primitive sign is in relief, but more difficult to notice on a
photography.
In fact, I should have organized the vote in another way : QUESTION
A : "Do you recognize the "upside down V" ? " QUESTION B ONLY for
people having say YES to the first question : "What is you choice
between STATEMENT #1 and STATEMENT # 2 ?"

I don't change it, because even if I see the signs Heidi has marked
green/yellow and red, they seem to me to lay at very different levels.

And you are right !.. But this is not the problem, which is to
recognize what I call the "upside down V" !

I repeat here the way to find it : Look at the 5th group from the top
in Heidi's link hereafter. Notice UNDER the diagonal line of her "X"
in red, in the left part, a "second diagonal line". This is the
ascendent part of the "reversed V". Follow it from left to right up to
the "crossing", and there turn right downwards, to follow the
descendent branch of the "reversed V".
Now, you may go back to the original photo, and vote.

The Y I see lays at the deepest level. I agree that at different times
different signs have been there at different deeps. One of them and
perhaps the first one is this Y.

Yes. But as interesting these remarks are, they are irrelevant with
the question asked.



And by the way, I was also mistaken in saying "reversed". I meant
"upside down". Mais vous aviez corrigé de vous même, n'est-ce pas ?

Yes. A better redaction of mine would have been to talk about an
"upside down V". Sorry, not to have used it from the beginning...

Regards
grapheus



Ciao
Marco


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: This is a pol. Please, go to it !
    ... Well, if I'm that Marco, I did give my vote, that is choice #1. ... to recognize what I call the "upside down V", ... people having say YES to the first question: ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: This is a poll. Please, go to it !
    ... these compartments, you will see a hieroglyph looking like a ... understand what the "upside down V" is, ... Any vote will be welcome. ... damaged area looks, at first sight, like a mess, and it is not so easy ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: This is a poll. Please, go to it !
    ... these compartments, you will see a hieroglyph looking like a ... Any vote will be welcome. ... one MUST see the "upside down V" BEFORE voting. ... and at the crossing go downwards. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: This is a poll. Please, go to it !
    ... these compartments, you will see a hieroglyph looking like a ... Any vote will be welcome. ... one MUST see the "upside down V" BEFORE voting. ... damaged area looks, at first sight, like a mess, and it is not so easy ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: This is a poll. Please, go to it !
    ... these compartments, you will see a hieroglyph looking like a ... understand what the "upside down V" is, ... Any vote will be welcome. ... I don't see your inverted lambda ...
    (sci.archaeology)