Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Mar 2007 05:59:15 -0800
On Mar 4, 5:53 am, phogl...@xxxxxx wrote:
Herman Rubin wrote:
I do not know if much larger alphabets than the Latin one
have been successfully placed on typewriters.
As I am supposed to learn Amharic one of these days, I wonder how a
typewriter would handle fidal, i.e. the Amharic syllabary.
Olympia manufactured an Amharic typewriter; its keyboard layout is
included in the catalog reproduced in the back of Beeching's *Century
of the Typewriter*. Have you not noticed that there is a considerable
amount of regularity in the composition of the characters?
Actually,
the whole thing - I mean fidal - looks terribly crude and unreadable
to me.
Haven't you learned your lesson _yet_ about broadcasting bigoted
statements here?
Has it been directly computerized from manuscript characters,
or something?
Did you bother to investigate? Not long ago I downloaded a completely
serviceable Amharic font and IME, from a website gathering links to
all sorts of Unicode-related fonts. Type C and then V, and the correct
letter appears.
http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/index.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: This is a pol. Please, go to it !
- Next by Date: Re: Venom-spitting from a safe distance - Cybalist cave!
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|