Re: unnatural languages
- From: phoglund@xxxxxx
- Date: 4 Mar 2007 08:52:02 -0800
Joachim Pense wrote:
Am 4 Mar 2007 05:49:21 -0800 schrieb Peter T. Daniels:
On Mar 4, 4:58 am, phogl...@xxxxxx wrote:
Jens S. Larsen wrote:
Is that based on the pidgin-becoming-creole model?
If I am allowed to pick up the pidgin thread again: when Peter says
that the input a child being brought up in Esperanto receives is
pidgin Esperanto, he seems to me to be implying that all non-natively
spoken language, such as my attempt to speak English, is pidgin. (Of
course, he will howl abuse at me for misrepresenting him,
Learn what the word "abuse" means.
but this is
the sincere impression I have.) Thus, all imperfectly acquired
language is for him pidgin.
Learn what the word "pidgin" means.
Pidgin is a lingua franca (= a language used for communication between
members of different language communities) which has no native
speakers and has a rudimentary grammar. Happy now?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: unnatural languages
- References:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: phoglund
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: unnatural languages
- Prev by Date: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by Date: Re: Ger. Gewehr (gun), Gewähr (warranty) , Serb. kubura (handgun), ugovor (agreement)
- Previous by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Next by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|