Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: phoglund@xxxxxx
- Date: 4 Mar 2007 02:53:31 -0800
Herman Rubin wrote:
I do not know if much larger alphabets than the Latin one
have been successfully placed on typewriters.
As I am supposed to learn Amharic one of these days, I wonder how a
typewriter would handle fidal, i.e. the Amharic syllabary. Actually,
the whole thing - I mean fidal - looks terribly crude and unreadable
to me. Has it been directly computerized from manuscript characters,
or something?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by Date: Re: The word "rasismi" in Finnish (was Re: unnatural languages)
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Index(es):