Re: Ethiopic writing Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??

On Mar 5, 11:31 am, phogl...@xxxxxx wrote:
On 5 maalis, 17:34, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am not trying to score points, as you usually are. I am only
pointing out a fact that might be significant.

"Prove a point" and "make a point" have nothing to do with "scoring a
point."

I am not entirely convinced that you know the difference yourself.

I've been speaking the language for nearly 55 years. You obviously
haven't.

Even though the Avestan alphabet was available to them several
centuries before the Arabic script.

It certainly was,. but if I am not very much mistaken, Middle Persian
(Pahlavi) used a script that represented vowels at least as
inadequately as the Arabic alphabet.

Oh, don't even go there. I doubt you have the slightest idea how
Pahlavi represents the Iranian languages it was used for.

You might be correct, because my knowledge of Pahlavi is limited to
seeing the alphabet a couple of times in reference works. It is not a
very widely known script after all.

Read Skjaervo's account in WWS. It's not exactly transparent, but he
doesn't seem able to write for the non-specialist. But there really
isn't anyone else who can write on these subjects at all --
fortunately (I suppose), he seems never to turn down an invitation to
cotribute to a reference work.

I guess I need to read it, then.

You mean, you've been pontificating about Pahlavi without having
learned _anything_ about it?

I doubt I'll ever learn Middle
Persian, but Modern Persian is one of the languages I have started
years ago but never quite got on with them. (Irish used to be one,
too.)

I see. However, I would appreciate an elementary guidebook to writing
Amharic, which would show in what order the lines should be drawn.

Monica Devens showed me on a napkin in 5 minutes one day. Start at the
top left. See WWS p. 575.

At the top left? I'll have a go at it. Am I supposed to use a
paintbrush, or will a normal biro pen do the job?

You're "supposed" to use a pen. Do you know what a "paintbrush" is? Do
you suppose that the brush used for writing Chinese resembles a
"paintbrush" in anything other than having bristles mounted in a
handle?

What about Ethiopic writing suggests to you that it's written with a
"paintbrush"?

Have you never even had any training in using a broadedge pen?

It looks more
elegant and is easier to read, and I think it would be no problem to
modify the Arabic alphabet for use in Amharic. But of course, for
saying that you will call me a crypto-Muslim fundamentalist bigot.

No, your bigotry is exposed by such words as "crude," "unreadable,"
and non-"elegant."

People have these things called aesthetic preferences, and I very much
prefer the Arabic alphabet - for aesthetic reasons. But then I have
always been fascinated by calligraphy.

"Crude" and "unreadable" are not aesthetic judgments.

Please do not try to intimidate me. You know I am not afraid of you
anymore.-

Oh, you mean you don't know the meanings of the words "crude" and
"unreadable"? Then you shouldn't be using them.

Okay. Let's make it "difficult to read for the untrained eye"

Um, wouldn't that apply to any script in the world that you haven't
been "trained" in?

and
"aesthetically somewhat less pleasing than Arabic calligraphy". Happy
now?-

Chacun a son gout. There's no tradition of rendering Ethiopic texts
unreadable for the sake of esthetic impression.

.

Relevant Pages