Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Mar 2007 06:25:55 -0800
On Mar 6, 6:41 am, phogl...@xxxxxx wrote:
Well, in Arabic there are often distinctive differences between letter-
forms in the beginning, middle, and end of a word, and this enhances
the readability in a way that can be somehow compared to upper- and
lower-case.
That may be the very first time I've seen this described as a feature
rather than a bug!
One result of the allography is that word spacing is dispensable.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: 欲無言
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: phoglund
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: phoglund
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: phoglund
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: phoglund
- intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Prev by Date: Re: Ethiopic writing Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by Date: Re: Possible Lebanese word query
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|