Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Padraic Brown <elemtilas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:54:00 -0400
On 11 Mar 2007 11:18:27 -0700, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 11, 1:52 pm, Prai Jei <pvstowns...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Joachim Pense (or somebody else of the same name) wrote
guessing:
mal = bad
san = health
ulejo - that could indeed be a sequence of suffixes.
mal- negative prefix, no connotations of badness or evil
How can "negative" _not_ have "connotations of badness or evil"? This
is supposed to be a language used by humans.
Mal- is simply a prefix that forms an antonym of the root it precedes.
No moral wossname there at all, no question of good or bad or wrong or
right.
I'm sure you knew this already, or could have looked it up with ease.
Padraic
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- References:
- Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Prai Jei
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Esperanto and Interlingua
- Prev by Date: Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- Next by Date: Re: Ethiopic writing Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Previous by thread: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Next by thread: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|