Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailonsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:14:07 +0100
12 Mar 2007 04:49:39 -0700: "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
Is malgranda = small also 'dangerous, evil'?
If the language has no way of distinguishing between "small" and "not
big," then it's a pretty piss-poor language.
Malgranda doesn't mean "not big" but "the contrary of big", i.e.
small. Cf. malvarma = cold.
--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- References:
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Prai Jei
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Padraic Brown
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Padraic Brown
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: mb
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Prev by Date: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Next by Date: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Previous by thread: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Next by thread: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Index(es):