Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailonsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:53:04 +0100
Mon, 12 Mar 2007 23:36:58 +0800: LEE Sau Dan
<danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
So, Esperanto is difficult to learn.
I doubt it. But I don't know it very well myself, so perhaps you're
right.
You not only need to learn the
above possibilities (which are rarely used), but also learn what most
users employ, which resembles their own languages. That's a lot of
things to learn. Russian speakers speak Esperanto in a very Russian
way. Hungarian speakers speak Esperanto in a very Hungarian way.
Japanese speakers speak Esperanto in a very Japanese way, ...
That is to be expected. I wonder if these differences are very marked
in practice. I never noticed it, but my own experience with Esperanto
is very limited.
--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Oliver Cromm
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- References:
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Padraic Brown
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Padraic Brown
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: mb
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Prev by Date: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Next by Date: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Previous by thread: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Next by thread: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Index(es):