Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailonsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:54:15 +0100
Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:13:00 -0500: Nathan Sanders
<nsanders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
If the language has no way of distinguishing between "big" and "not
small," then it's a pretty piss-poor language.
malmalgranda? :-P
Nemalgranda = not small
Malnegranda = big? (the opposite of "not big", what would that be?)
--
Ruud Harmsen - http://rudhar.com
.
- References:
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Padraic Brown
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Padraic Brown
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: mb
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Prev by Date: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Next by Date: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Previous by thread: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Next by thread: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Index(es):