Re: unnatural languages
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:48:16 -0400
On 12 Mar 2007 15:02:57 -0400, Herman Rubin
<hrubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:et4851$2oro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in sci.lang:
In article <1173718375.324131.311620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Peter T. Daniels <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
Human infants are language-acquisition-machines, and their internal
equipment is attuned to certain types of input data -- namely, human
language.
They are knowledge acquisition machines, and there is no
evidence whatever that they are attuned to the various
types of human languages more than others.
There is no evidence that they are attuned to any linguistic
data *except* natural human language.
[...]
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: unnatural languages
- References:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Jens S. Larsen
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: unnatural languages
- Prev by Date: Re: unnatural languages
- Next by Date: Re: How does Armenian fit into the Indo-European family?
- Previous by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Next by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|