Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Oliver Cromm <lispamateur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:52:37 -0400
* Peter T. Daniels wrote:
On Mar 11, 3:54 pm, Padraic Brown <elemti...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11 Mar 2007 11:18:27 -0700, "Peter T. Daniels"
How can "negative" _not_ have "connotations of badness or evil"? This
is supposed to be a language used by humans.
Mal- is simply a prefix that forms an antonym of the root it precedes.
No moral wossname there at all, no question of good or bad or wrong or
right.
I'm sure you knew this already, or could have looked it up with ease.
Then "negative" was an inapt characterization.
So "not" is not a negative?
--
A computer will do what you tell it to do, but that may be much
different from what you had in mind. - Joseph Weizenbaum
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- References:
- Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Prai Jei
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Padraic Brown
- Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Esperanto and Interlingua
- Prev by Date: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Next by Date: Re: Ventris' grid
- Previous by thread: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Next by thread: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|