Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- From: Oliver Cromm <lispamateur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:39:39 -0400
* Aidan Kehoe wrote:
Spamassassin, one of the few widely useful and deployed natural language
processing applications, was written entirely in Perl. Iʼm not aware of any
natural language processing applications written in Prolog or Lisp that have
served a useful purpose beyond a) absorbing research grant money or b)
proving that Prolog, Lisp and traditional computational linguistics
approaches are ill-suited to natural language processing.
Perl is good for surface-processing of written language. But since even
objects are awkward in Perl, it is ill suited for deeper (e.g.
grammatical or semantic) analysis.
Spamassassin doesn't use significant linguistic information, AFAIK.
--
Strategy: A long-range plan whose merit cannot be evaluated until
sometime after those creating it have left the organization.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- From: Lars Skovlund
- Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- References:
- Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- From: Helmut Weber
- Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- Prev by Date: Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- Next by Date: Re: Esperanto and Interlingua
- Previous by thread: Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- Next by thread: Re: Does natural language skill translate to programming skill?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|