Re: unnatural languages

In article <1173823970.981242.310730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Peter T. Daniels <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 13, 4:53 pm, hru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Herman Rubin) wrote:
In article <YE68kkJnro9FF...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Richard Herring <richard.herr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Few American college students speak reasonably grammatical
English, and their writing is not much better.

By now, you are either deliberately lying, or you are utterly
uneducable.

Possibly college students in language departments
students, and have read letters of application
by them.


Equivocation on "understand". Knowing that a particular verb ending
represents the pluperfect subjunctive is not the same thing as
extracting what it means. One doesn't understand speech in a foreign
language by consciously "looking up" each word in a mental primer.

One does not learn any concept by memorization. Do not
confuse learning the grammar with memorizing the rules.

How dare you attempt to respond to Richard's argument by repeating his

I did it in a far more general context.
own words back at him.

Learning
the structure of French, or Hebrew, makes it possible
not to just translate, but to internalize what is learned.
That's not what "internalize" means, and learning *about* the structure
of a language doesn't help one to be fluent in it..

It certainly helps in reading.

No, it does not.

Even reading is mastered by children before "grammar" instruction

This is partly true, but it is not learned before
a good part of the structure of the grammars of
their languages have been internalized.


Learning to read is an activity quite distinct from language
acquisition.

Is it? How about language acquisition by the deaf?

Are you suggesting that communicating via sign language is somehow
like reading?

Please learn something about something before you opine about it.

Unclear. What is a language? There is a language
of mathematics, which is entirely written;
Not a language in the sense that linguists use the word. How many times
do I have to repeat this?

If everyone used the term "language" in the sense you
are using it, world communication will decline.

splork

Most of the world's people have a very precise grasp
of basic arithmetic, and know exactly who owes whom and how much, both
in financial and moral terms.

I think you will find "basic arithmetic" not to be well
understood.

As you very well know, Richard is not using the term "basic
arithmetic" in the professional mathematician's sense of some obscure
division of mathematics, but in the sense of adding, subtracting,
mul;tiplying, and dividing.

They know the operations, but often have little or no idea
of what numbers, or the operations, mean. This in a
particular individual started the "new math" program.

When it comes to government, how many have
a clear idea of what even they would consider a good form?

Was that supposed to be interpretable?

Yes.

There are three levels of language involved in statistics.
The immediate level is probability, which has its own
concepts, very poorly understood by those learning by
memorization and computation.
Not a language in the sense that linguists use the word.

Again, maybe the linguists should broaden their scope.
Some scientists have, and this group is sci.lang.

Maybe the statisticians should start using words the way other people
do.

Mathematicians, physicists, biologists, etc., have long
realized that they cannot do their subjects by doing so.
What does "number" mean? When looked at carefully, there
are several concepts here, at least two really basic ones.
One can define the arithmetic operations without having
a system of writing numbers, and will not understand them
until one can do this.

Most people seem to think that statistics is merely a
set of formulas into which data can be poured and will
output the state of the universe. Only magic can do
that much. They need to be taught that the size of a
good random sample needed for a given accuracy does not
depend on the population size if the population is large.
They need to understand probability, and I assure you
that this is NOT easy.

If they cannot use that language, they will be unable
to understand the concepts.
If they cannot use that *notation system*, they will be unable to
understand the concepts. That doesn't make it a language.

Understanding the "notation system" is NOT enough.
It is a language, rigid in grammar, but with a small
but extendible vocabulary.

Nothing whatsoever to do with human language.

It certainly does. What language do you think people in
the various sciences use?

Those who have only learned words as arbitrary sequences
of characters, not subject to any phonic rules, will not
be able to use the alphabet even for easy words. One of
my former colleagues saw the word "rug" italicized as a
word the seventh graders could not be expected to know.
They just learn by rote a collection of words as strings
of letters, with no restrictions.

Evidently you're not aware that linguists do not endorse the "whole
word" method.

But many teachers do; see the letters to the editor
in the March 13 _New York Times_.

In statistics, they learn formulas, and apply them with
know idea of the limitations of the formulas, or the
desirability of using that formula in that situation.

If someone has some data, and just adds, subtracts,
multiplies, and divides almost at will, do you think
the result will be meaningful?

If the data are the prices of the goods in their shopping cart, and
they need to determine whether they have enough cash in their wallet
to pay for the goods plus the sales tax, then absolutely yes.

A vanishingly small portion of the population has any need for
anything more advanced.

Wrong. The human body is sufficiently complex that
medical actions should be taken by using the individual's
preferences for the various outcomes, weighted by the
probabilities. This applies to the whole population.

--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: In Office 2007 the single quotation mark changes the following
    ... However, for more information on language formatting, see ... "Graham Mayor" wrote: ... All other keys seem to work as designated. ... u i o a and c letters after the ' & " keys. ...
    (microsoft.public.word.docmanagement)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic
    ... AI, a language, ... First pass recognizes the letters and identifies them as being of the ... but it has the concept of a Letter by now learned in the first lesson ... base inheritance of "Node" and return command objects. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Creating functions for Kabbalah
    ... >> that produce meaninfull relationships within the language.. ... write down the letters in ... > number names from 1 to 9 in English adds up to its value. ... If you look at mathematics as a language the same as english it seems ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Spelling rules in old languages
    ... > fixed values for the letters; the language was then fixed for literary ... > language were left out ... id est formulam rationemque scribendi a grammaticis ... litteras modo sed syllabas aut permutat aut praeterit, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: PEP 3131: Supporting Non-ASCII Identifiers
    ... identifiers in Python. ... The diatribe about cross language understanding of Python code is IMHO ... Not providing an explicit listing of allowed characters is inexcusable ... categories uppercase letters, lowercase letters, titlecase ...
    (comp.lang.python)