Re: unnatural languages
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Mar 2007 20:19:30 -0700
On Mar 14, 5:56 pm, hru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Herman Rubin) wrote:
In article <1173839013.299984.50...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Peter T. Daniels <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 13, 7:41 pm, "Brian M. Scott" <b.sc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 13 Mar 2007 14:58:26 -0700, "Peter T. Daniels"
<gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
Can you point to a cohort raised on Cuisinaire Rods thatThat's the generation that can't add, subtract, multiply,Later generations are significantly worse, simply because
or divide without a calculator.
calculators are now ubiquitous.
_can_ do its ciphering without a calculater? or at least
an abacus?
<> I can't point to a cohort raised on Cuisenaire rods, which
<> in any case were not a fundamental part of the 'new math'.
<> I also can't point to a cohort that can reliably do
<> arithmetic without a calculator, especially if it involves
<> fractions, and my students range from late teens on up, with
<> quite a few in their 40s or older.
<Well, we graduated from high school in 1968, and we certainly could do
<all that.
SOME could.
No, we all could.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: unnatural languages
- References:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: unnatural languages
- Prev by Date: Re: does Spanish have a "going-to" future?
- Next by Date: Re: unnatural languages
- Previous by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Next by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|