Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: "gunananda" <gunananda@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Mar 2007 12:15:23 -0700
I do not know about other languages; certainly Chinese,
Babylonian, and Maya seem not to have developed an
alphabetic form, and there is at least one cuneiform
alphabet, Ugaritic.
there are a lot of alphabetic forms of chinese like chinese braille
writing for the blind and some historical ones , yes , and there
are books in pinyin (does not matter how frequent they are used)
.
- References:
- intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: 欲無言
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Oliver Cromm
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Herman Rubin
- intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Prev by Date: Re: Etymology of *teuta- 'tribe'
- Next by Date: Re: unnatural languages
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|