Re: unnatural languages
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Mar 2007 06:57:12 -0700
On Mar 15, 3:43 pm, hru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Herman Rubin) wrote:
In article <1173929457.442038.57...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Peter T. Daniels <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 14, 5:43 pm, hru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Herman Rubin) wrote:
In article <1173824361.678668.201...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,It is of course part of every human language. It needs no "adding"
Peter T. Daniels <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 13, 3:48 pm, hru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Herman Rubin) wrote:One can try too hard to achieve what cannot yet be done.
BTW, algebraic notation can be applied to ordinaryApplications of logical systems to human language were tried --
language. Variables are linguistic entities, which
can substitute for anything, and have rigid rules.
Euclid could, and did, use variables for geometric
objects, but variables for anything else had not yet
been invented.
Generative Semantics, Montague grammar -- and were soon abandoned.
I was not suggesting replacing language, but adding the
capabilities of "algebraic notation" to language. This
is partly done now, but clumsily and in too limited a
manner. We use such terms as gizmo, doohickey,
whatamajig; these are used as variables. We also say,
"From place A to place B." this is linguistic use of
variables, and we could replace "A" by "Q" and "B" by
"RsT". If we had a few dozen places to keep track
of, or people, we could use variables for notation.
We can even use variables for verbs or adjectives.
THIS is the suggestion, and it can be done early.
from "algebraic notation."
It is?
For the umpteen gazillionth time, learn something about human language
before you continue to spout off abuot it.
Or even "foundations of mathematics," as in Russell and Whitehead, or
Carnap, etc.
EVERYTHING in human language that isn't a proper name is a variable.
Why could not the Greeks use it?
Because Euclid and Archimedes weren't as smart as you?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: unnatural languages
- References:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: unnatural languages
- Prev by Date: Re: unnatural languages
- Next by Date: Re: Why these naked woman look so beautiful
- Previous by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Next by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|