Re: unnatural languages
- From: Oliver Cromm <lispamateur@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:39:33 -0400
* Herman Rubin wrote:
Do you include verbs, adjectives, adverbs? And at most,
these are highly restricted variables. The brevity of the
notation is important. How would YOU use human language
to disambiguate
He gave him his toy.
You don't need to disambiguate a sentence, the sentence was uttered to
disambiguate a situation. You only need to say that which isn't already
clear from context [1] or irrelevant anyway. That's why "he" and "him"
were used above, because in context, there was no need to specify the
people more exactly. Or so the speaker thought.
____
[1] Credit for this observation goes to Hockett (at least, for having
made me familiar with this approach).
--
A chrysanthemum by any other name would be easier to spell.
Peter Moylan in alt.usage.english
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: unnatural languages
- References:
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: unnatural languages
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: unnatural languages
- Prev by Date: Re: How does Armenian fit into the Indo-European family?
- Next by Date: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Previous by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Next by thread: Re: unnatural languages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|