Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Artur Jachacy <arturj.usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:26:00 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:24:05 +0800, LEE Sau Dan wrote:
"Peter" == Peter T Daniels <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > If for some bizarre reason it was necessary to make a
>> > distinction, we have "uncle on my father's side" and "uncle on
>> > my mother's side."
>>
>> If I said "paternal uncle" and "maternal uncle", would these
>> terms mean the same things to you or would they mean something
>> different (e.g. father's uncle and mother's uncle)?
Peter> No, those are fine, but they don't belong to an Peter>
everyday-speech register.
So, isn't it a defect of your language, given that you consider using
<yuan2> to mean USD or YEN or AUD or EUR to be a defect?
Polish used to have a lot of family relation terms, but it's been losing
them like crazy. Are you suggesting that it's going to the dogs?
Artur
--
Pan for Windows (beta) - <http://panbuilds.googlepages.com>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- References:
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Prev by Date: Re: Icelandic phonology?
- Next by Date: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|