Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan <danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:56:29 +0800
"Artur" == Artur Jachacy <arturj.usenet@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Artur> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:24:05 +0800, LEE Sau Dan wrote:
>>>>>>> "Peter" == Peter T Daniels <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >> > If for some bizarre reason it was necessary to make a >>
>> > distinction, we have "uncle on my father's side" and "uncle
>> on >> > my mother's side."
>> >>
>> >> If I said "paternal uncle" and "maternal uncle", would these
>> >> terms mean the same things to you or would they mean
>> something >> different (e.g. father's uncle and mother's
>> uncle)?
>>
Peter> No, those are fine, but they don't belong to an Peter>
>> everyday-speech register.
>>
>> So, isn't it a defect of your language, given that you consider
>> using <yuan2> to mean USD or YEN or AUD or EUR to be a defect?
Artur> Polish used to have a lot of family relation terms, but
Artur> it's been losing them like crazy. Are you suggesting that
Artur> it's going to the dogs?
Not me. It's PTD.
--
Lee Sau Dan 李守敦 ~{@nJX6X~}
E-mail: danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home page: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~danlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- References:
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Artur Jachacy
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Prev by Date: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by Date: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|